Pointy letters

Last year my type thoughts were consumed with handwritten type lettering, but Squarespace's release of the Marquee template gave me a really renewed appreciation for Futura at normal and medium weights.

I've come to realize, it's the sharp, pointy capital letters. So here's my roundup of faves in terms of pointy factor. I love a nice SHARP point.

While Futura Medium technically may have more point than Frontage-Regular, where Frontage excels is in the fact that it retains the pointiness in Frontage-Bold. Once Futura gets bold it totally loses that.

When I first saw MTT Milano a few weeks ago, my heart actually sank a little because I felt like I was cheating on Frontage (I never feel like I cheat on Gotham, which I'll post about later). But I soon came to realize that while they're VERY similar, there's a place in my heart for both of them.

While Frontage as a family was created to be layered, it doesn't have a weight as thin as Milano. Or, lowercase letters. And it has an E that *I* think is cool but might be a little too novel for casual use. I modify it in certain instances. So:

Frontage Pros:

  • Pointy
  • Family made for layering, which is COOL
  • Regular and bold weights


Frontage Cons:

  • Funky E
  • VERY wide kerning 


MTT Milano Pros:

  • Lowercase letters
  • Normal E
  • Normal kerning


MTT Milano Cons:

  • Only one thin weight 
  • Not *quite* as much character as Frontage

 

But, bonus love for the uppercase W.

Look out for the upcoming Frontage vs. Milano love battle. <3

 

Futura Heavy — notice the blunted points.

Left: Frontage-Regular, Right: MTT Milano. One largely distinguishable difference. I think the funky  E is cool, but too novel for some circumstances.

MTT Milano: I AM a sucker for that W, though.

 
Previous
Previous

Pavonated: The majesty of the peacock

Next
Next

The Venn diagram of design headaches